Donor Eligibility

Donor eligibility and 361 HCT/P backed by ex-FDA reviewers.

Tree-lined road leading to an FDA campus at dusk
72-hr
Turnaround on a former-FDA-validated determination report.
92% faster
A determination assessed in minutes, versus the hour a manual review takes.
99%+
Accuracy, benchmarked across FDA submission cases.
How it works

Increase efficiency with our assessments.

Quick and easy access to assessments you can trust.

  1. Clear a donor in minutes.

    Upload the screening, testing, and records you have for one donor and get back a structured determination — a clear outcome and the specific gaps that need to close.

  2. Reviewed based on FDA expectations.

    Every eligibility determination is reviewed against FDA expectations to ensure it stands up to regulator inspections.

  3. Establishment-level inspection ready.

    Pre-audit your establishment program controls including screening, testing, records and SOPs against audit expectations.

  4. Catch false positives.

    When evidence is missing or ambiguous, the assessment flags it rather than passing it — built to err on the side of caution, because a false “eligible” is the costliest error in donor eligibility.

361 classification

361 HCT/P Classification

Talk to us for an assessment.

  1. Minimal manipulation

    Processing doesn’t alter the original relevant characteristics of structural tissue — or the relevant biological characteristics of cells and nonstructural tissue.

  2. Homologous use only

    The HCT/P performs the same basic function in the recipient that it did in the donor. Labeling, IFU, indication, and marketing all have to tell that one story.

  3. Not combined with another article

    No added scaffold, carrier, or drug — only water, crystalloids, or a sterilizing, preserving, or storage agent that raises no new clinical safety concern.

  4. No systemic effect or metabolic dependence

    No systemic effect and no reliance on the metabolic activity of living cells — unless the use is autologous, in a first- or second-degree relative, or reproductive.

Expert Highlight

Scott A. Brubaker

Nearly 40 years in human tissue policy. Scott chaired CBER’s Tissue Reference Group and served nearly 8 years as Director of FDA’s Division of Human Tissues, leading federal policy under 21 CFR Part 1271 — after 12 years as SVP of Policy at the AATB.

Special Advisor at Deffai · author of the Standards for Tissue Banking (AATB, editions 11–14).

Scott A. Brubaker
Questions

Frequently asked

Does Deffai make the eligibility determination for us?

We provide draft report and determination rationale. The determination of record is made and signed by your establishment’s Responsible Person under your validated SOPs.

Does this cover both 361 and 351 products?

Yes. Donor eligibility under 21 CFR Part 1271 Subpart C applies to both 361 HCT/Ps and 351 HCT/Ps.

What do we upload, and what do we get back?

You provide the records you have for one donor — screening, testing, and documentation. You get back a structured Donor Eligibility Determination Report, with every finding cited to the governing section, that you can export to Word.

Who is this built for?

HCT/P recovery and processing establishments, tissue banks, and the Responsible Persons and QA / regulatory teams accountable for every determination.

Who built it?

Former FDA reviewers — including the former Director of FDA’s Division of Human Tissues, who chaired CBER’s Tissue Reference Group, and a former TRG reviewer.

Do you use our data to train AI?

No. We never train AI on your data, and we don’t allow third parties, including foundation models, to either. Read more about security.

Make donor eligibility determinations with confidence.